At the beginning of the month I asked 2gether 4 infinity if I could be granted admin rights. I may have only been here for less than a year, but I feel I have the qualifications for becoming an admin. I'm pretty much always around and I already handle many major jobs like managing the main page and the featured articles. I also catch mistakes pretty quickly and I'm quick to help. I know I've been in conflict as well, but I try to stay as neutral as I can. Will you please consider my request as well?
Of course I can make you admin! We could use another guardian anyways because we're only two admins here (now we're three, and soon to be four). If you say you have the time to manage the main page, then that would be very helpful! I'll go right ahead and make you admin. Hope you'll help keep this wiki in better shape!
(And now that you're admin, I guess that would mean you can now delete all those duplicates yourself without having to report to me. Ha ha.)
Hi TacticalMaster, I have a request. I would like to apply for adminship. I have been here for over a year and I believed that I have the qualifications to become an admin. I am a frequent contributer to the wiki and I think that I can help manage the wiki. I can handle larger projects and jobs. I have had a few arguements with members in the past but I've tried my best to become impartial on such incidents. Would you please consider my request?
Oh, so you want to become an admin? Well, I would say yeah! But sadly, I can't. I don't have the bureaucrat rights, after all. And the only one who has that is...2gether 4 infinity. But I haven't ever seen her lately...at all. So even if I do want to make you admin, I don't have the power to do that.
We could use another keeper anyways. But as of right now, I have to see if I can find a way to get the bureaucrat rights and get you to be an admin. I'll try to.
And yeah. Checked your message wall and it seems like most of your colleagues overlooked this request. Heh.
for your information its not just a fansite its a multi anime wikia with very few contributors, so the main contributors which two of which go to full time education and have to fit homework and social in before editing the wiki. We plan on addiing very many anime some if which have one page wikis so don't tell me it's a fansite
i wasn't being rude, it's not a fansite, it's a multi wiki anime which is completely different from a fansite. Believe it or not that wiki already helps this one, I use the coord descriptions here as guide, but if i see something missing, i'll add it there and here. You were the one being rude by stating something someone has put alot of effort into isn't good enough for you and by your standards is just a fansite. Also for your information i don't like kiddy grade yet i still help out, with that section of the wiki. So it's not a fansite..http://animerulezzz.org/ this is
Again, you still being rude. Hey, I understand the work you and your colleagues of contributors put in, but an all-in-one wiki doesn't sound right to me. It would be just confusing by mixing up several animes in one wiki. Is there even a good focused consistency?
But really, you're just being defensive there, alright? Don't be mad about it just because they expressed their reason for denial.
i wasn't being rude, but you offended me by saying my work was nothng more than a fan site, i would have understood if you had said people think you steal from us or something like that, but you didn't. You don't even admit to being rude, in the first place, i understand you don't like multi anime wiki's now which is a better reason than calling a wikia a fansite and offending the people in charge of that wiki. We each have a job and an anime under our control. If i find a job to big for me i ask the others to help, they do the same.
look im sorry if i came across as rude, but there is a thing called sugarcoating. This means you say something in a nice way so you don't go sounding rude and offending people, I may be an admin of the winterbells wiki, but i am also a member here and i notice everytime you and me have an arguement, it's becuase you offend me by being blunt. So i was wandering if I have done something to unintentionally offend you or if its just you unintentionally offending me
Look, all I said that "it wouldn't work out." So what is your problem with that? It's just one reason of denial and suddenly you can't handle the fact at all. You can't even accept one criticism and if possible, turn it into something useful such as an improvement opportunity? I said I was being honest and said "no." Simple as that. And it was supported with a reason. Yet you think the word "no" is too strong for you to handle.
You said that you were trying to "sugarcoat" your messages, which means you were trying to make a positive statement as you can. I can understand you were trying to explain to me. You said you and your colleague put a lot of work into it. Yes, I undstand. The dedication and all. And you said that it's a mix of anime you collected. But the thing is, that's the problem it has with me. An all-in-one anime doesn't work out for me because it mixes a lot of anime together, which can make the key focus confusing. A wiki focused on one universe makes it easier because it contains content of only one entire universe. I already said this twice already now... I already understood what your winterbells1 wiki is, since you told me. But you have to understand that reason why I have to say no.
You can't just take my denial too seriously. But in your second message, you ended it by saying "Don't tell me it's a fansite". That made me think you are having a problem with me saying "no." It's a simple no. There was nothing blunt about my response. I was being honest.
Really, watch what you say. Sometimes an extra remark can start a petty argument like this...
you don't understand at all, I can handle the word no. But you offended me with the reason, you offeneded me by saying "It's just a fansite" thats all im trying to get across. Also about the sugarcoating bit i was saying you should try it, i got mad becuase you were blunt and rude and you offended me becuase of it. Thats all im trying to say, I was expecting you to say no so it didn't come of a shock, but you were just rude in the way you repiled to me that is all im saying.
So what you're trying to tell me is that you're just ticked off all because I said a simple opinion that drove you mad? Why? Because it's not what you intended your work to be identified as? You can't even handle a simple criticism that you can use for plenty of ideal improvements? Or is it because you can't handle the truth? Really? How hard and badly did you take my response for? I simply stated my reason of denial from my review perspective with no lies at all and you think it's a challenge. You just think I am very hard on you, but I just reasoned why it wouldn't work it. I wasn't being blunt. It was a simple refusal and the reason why. But, you did told me the purpose of your wiki, but I still don't think it will work out at all.
I am not rude. You're just thinking I am because of one phrase that made you a ticking time bomb. Extinguish the fuse already and stop trying to throw a fit all because you can't handle the truth.
I wasn't throwing a fit on my last message, but you were rude and blunt in your first reply, you may not see it but thats how you came across to me. I can handle the truth, but what you said wasnt the truth, its not a fansite at all, which made me defensive because it wasn't true at all. It's a wiki like this one where people work hard when they have time.
Please don't go calling me things like a ticking time bomb, trying to guess what im thinking or what i can handle when you don't know me well at all. I wasn't thinking it was a challange at all, im just trying to get you to understand that the word fansite offended me because I put work into a multi anime wiki just for it to be down graded when i asked nicely for an affiliation.
Next time a multi anime wiki asks for an affliation don't call it a fansite becuase that does actually offend the people who work on it. just say what you said to me in a later reply "but an all-in-one wiki doesn't sound right to me" or something along those lines.
P.S I have been calm all the way through this message, Ive tried to give you advice on how to answer people better who are with multi anime wikis. I am also going to ask you not to say anything that may involve what I can and can't handle, a name like a ticking time bomb, or try to interpret what im thinking. So if you reply please please please do not say anything related to the issues above(unless you really understand me my mind is a mystery). I'm apoligizing again for being rude and if i unitentionally offended you. I don't want this to cause a bigger rift between our wiki's as it is, so we can we please put this behind us and forget this happened.
p.s.s Please dont block me x.x i do like people on this wiki
I wasn't being blunt, okay??? But I did state my point why I said no, alright??? You need to learn how to take a criticism like a proper grown up and turn the hard way into a positive idea. It's like making and publishing a video game and taking in other people's reviews into future improvements. All you've been doing was being so worked up on ONE phrase. Seriously, get over it. Why would you think it will bite off the wiki's pride just because I said "no?" Heck, if I tried to request affiliation with this wiki to another anime wiki that possibly has the same light-hearted genre as Aikatsu, would they say yes? I don't think so, because they'll say no with a reason.
But you didn't offended me. I was only concerned is why are you so overreacting on a single phrase. It's such a trivial act on how that would affect your wiki's pride.
But you must understand that a "multi-wiki" wouldn't work out to me. A collection of anime mixed in would throw off focus on one universe. That's why I had to say "no," in a honest way, alright? Ugh, this is already how far I'm going with this paragraph...
And I'm not blocking you just so I can end this petty dispute. That's being a bad admin, like you see in every macho-enforced wikis.
There's a user on here that's creating invalid pages by renaming the important ones (i.e. the infobox template page and its doc page) and simply creating invalid pages in general. I normally wouldn't ask for this, but could you or someone block them? They are User:785253.
The very first one isn't a duplicate, but it's literally a less than a second apart from a similar picture of the same scene that's already on the site. Unfortunately for me, I didn't pay to that until after I uploaded it.